At the board work session on Monday, February 6th there was discussion of restricting the use of bond funds so that either bonds would not be sold, or issued bonds would be paid off early should proceeds not be needed for the proposed scope of the projects in the April 17th bond request.ÌýÌý Following that meeting I have discussed various options with Jim Bays, Faith Pettis (bond counsel), and Mark Prussing (financial advisor).
Based on those conversations I have put together a list of options, advantages/disadvantages of each, and a recommendation on how to proceed.
Options for Bond
There are four options to consider when it comes to a bond sale.
1)ÌýÌý Sell only the bonds we need, when we need them
2)ÌýÌý Sell the entire authorization and maintain those funds in the Capital Projects Fund, then:
a.ÌýÌýÌýÌý Maintain those funds in the capital projects fund and use them for other capital project's needs that may arise following a hearing that is required by statute and the bond resolutionb.ÌýÌýÌýÌý Upon acceptance of all projects authorized by the voters as defined in the bond resolution, transfer remaining funds into the debt service fund to pay debt on these and other bonds on their call date.c.ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý Upon acceptance of all projects authorized by the voters as defined in the bond resolution, transfer remaining funds into the debt service fund and immediately pay off bonds which were marketed and sold as "callable bonds"
a.ÌýÌýÌýÌý Maintain those funds in the capital projects fund and use them for other capital project's needs that may arise following a hearing that is required by statute and the bond resolution
b.ÌýÌýÌýÌý Upon acceptance of all projects authorized by the voters as defined in the bond resolution, transfer remaining funds into the debt service fund to pay debt on these and other bonds on their call date.
c.ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý Upon acceptance of all projects authorized by the voters as defined in the bond resolution, transfer remaining funds into the debt service fund and immediately pay off bonds which were marketed and sold as "callable bonds"
(these options may be combined into a ‘hybrid' of the above options")
Discussion
There are advantages and disadvantages to each of these approaches.ÌýÌý
1) Sell only the bonds we need, when we need them.
Advantages
Disadvantages
2a) Sell the entire authorization and maintain those funds in the Capital Projects Fund, then maintain those funds in the capital projects fund and use them for other capital project's needs that may arise following a hearing that is required by statute and the bond resolution
2b) Sell the entire authorization and maintain those funds in the Capital Projects Fund, then upon acceptance of all projects authorized by the voters as defined in the bond resolution, transfer remaining funds into the Debt Service Fund to pay debt on these and other bonds on their call date.
2c) Sell the entire authorization and maintain those funds in the Capital Projects Fund, then upon acceptance of all projects authorized by the voters as defined in the bond resolution, transfer remaining funds into the debt service fund and immediately pay off bonds which were marketed and sold with a "Short Call""
Ìý
Recommendation:
My recommendation is that the board consider a hybrid approach of option 1 and option 2a and 2b.
1)ÌýÌý Divide the bond sale into a set of three issues:
a.ÌýÌýÌýÌý The first issue will be over half of the authorization.Ìý This will likely take place in June 2012.Ìý ÌýFunds will be used to pay the costs of site development, project development, and up to half of the anticipated construction costs. b.ÌýÌýÌýÌý The second issue will be potentially up to the remainder of the authorization, (if it appears that all funds will be necessary to complete the scope of the proposed projects).Ìý This will likely take place after the projects have been bid, in June or December 2014.Ìý ÌýFunds will be used to pay the anticipated costs of completing construction.ÌýÌý If bids come in lower than the estimates then the issuance would be reduced commensurate with the lower bids. c.ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý The third issue would be set, should there be remainder capacity from the authorization, to cover any exceptional change orders, or options that may occur in the course of construction that will necessitate additional funds beyond what was anticipated in the second issue.ÌýÌýÌý It is likely that this third issue would be a smaller issue than the first two issues and may have slightly higher interest rates and issuance costs.Ìý There is a potential advantage in the third sale if the issue is under $10 million in a calendar year that we may achieve a lower interest because of special tax status provided to banks who purchase small issues.
a.ÌýÌýÌýÌý The first issue will be over half of the authorization.Ìý This will likely take place in June 2012.Ìý ÌýFunds will be used to pay the costs of site development, project development, and up to half of the anticipated construction costs.
b.ÌýÌýÌýÌý The second issue will be potentially up to the remainder of the authorization, (if it appears that all funds will be necessary to complete the scope of the proposed projects).Ìý This will likely take place after the projects have been bid, in June or December 2014.Ìý ÌýFunds will be used to pay the anticipated costs of completing construction.ÌýÌý If bids come in lower than the estimates then the issuance would be reduced commensurate with the lower bids.
c.ÌýÌýÌýÌýÌý The third issue would be set, should there be remainder capacity from the authorization, to cover any exceptional change orders, or options that may occur in the course of construction that will necessitate additional funds beyond what was anticipated in the second issue.ÌýÌýÌý It is likely that this third issue would be a smaller issue than the first two issues and may have slightly higher interest rates and issuance costs.Ìý There is a potential advantage in the third sale if the issue is under $10 million in a calendar year that we may achieve a lower interest because of special tax status provided to banks who purchase small issues.
2)ÌýÌý Following a hearing, (required by statute) the board could consider transferring any remainder funds, into the Debt Service Fund to pay off the costs of bonds as they become due.ÌýÌý It is anticipated that the funds transferred would be smaller than if the entire issuance were sold, and not needed for the projects, thus mitigating the impacts of arbitrage and fluctuating tax rates.